29 Episodes

  1. Insubordination

    Published: 26/05/2025
  2. C2 and Peacekeeping

    Published: 13/04/2025
  3. Professionals Talk Logistics

    Published: 03/03/2025
  4. Ukrainian C2: Adaptation under fire

    Published: 10/02/2025
  5. CIMIC and C2

    Published: 27/01/2025
  6. Nuclear Command and Control

    Published: 23/12/2024
  7. C2, MDO and Synchronisation

    Published: 25/11/2024
  8. Horrid Bosses

    Published: 21/10/2024
  9. Synchronisation as Coupling

    Published: 23/09/2024
  10. Submarine Command and Control

    Published: 12/08/2024
  11. The Civ/Mil part from a NATO SecGen

    Published: 15/07/2024
  12. C2 Systems – how much has changed?

    Published: 17/06/2024
  13. Naval C2

    Published: 20/05/2024
  14. Not the Heroic Model of Decision-Making

    Published: 16/04/2024
  15. Delegation to the point of discomfort

    Published: 17/03/2024
  16. You Cannot Beat Winter

    Published: 19/02/2024
  17. The Devolution of Command

    Published: 22/01/2024
  18. Air C2

    Published: 11/12/2023
  19. NATO C2: How to improve

    Published: 27/11/2023
  20. JADC2: A primer

    Published: 13/11/2023

1 / 2

The Command and Control podcast breaks new ground in taking an independent and pragmatic look at what military command and control might look like for the fight tonight and the fight tomorrow. Join us as we talk through C2 for an era of high-end war fighting. The hypothesis is this: command is human, control has become more technological pronounced. As a result, the increasing availability of dynamic control measures is centralising control away from local command. It is a noticeable trend in Western C2 since the late 1980s. Over that time, blending human decision and cutting edge technology has been evolutionary but not deliberate: how will this change? Will it become dominated by a tendency to hoard power in those with the most computing power, might these factors serve to amplify the role of commanders? Given all the hyperbole about AI in C2 (and we will tackle some of that with AI experts), it's a conversation we need to have.