Quite Quitting? A big deal or nothing

For whatever reason, I've felt really upset by this whole "quiet quitting" debate. Two threads I've seen emerge that I'm trying to be less incensed and more curious about: 1. The idea that this should be a two-way conversation between employees and employers. While I don't disagree -- I want to see open dialogue about how we shape work going forward -- there are so many structural (and let's be honest, emotional) issues that make it nearly impossible for employees to be open and honest with both their managers and themselves about their experience. Set aside power dynamics for a moment. If you're completely burned out, how can you be expected to go deep into the "why" of it all -- and be able to bring a coherent story and/or solution to your manager? 2. All the talk of "going above and beyond" as a fair expectation for progressing in your career. It's one thing to show growth and tenacity in your role. It's quite another to take on additional responsibilities or work extra hours (shout out to the manager who got mad at me for leaving at 5 pm every day) to "prove" that you're ready for the next step. To me, it's always been an unfair expectation that I should have to "exceed expectations" in my job just to get a little extra money and maybe a promotion. And, frankly, for all the years I've gone above and beyond for my employers, I haven't gotten a whole lot in return (save a few exceptions) -- and I'm going to guess many others feel the same way. At the very least, it is good to see us start moving toward a real discussion about what work means in our society, how big a role it should play in our lives, and what we can do to continue bringing new ideas to the world without sacrificing our sanity. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/lindsaydahl_for-whatever-reason-ive-felt-really-upset-activity-6970013619526766592-_wmY?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/stephen-fahey/message