Open Source Anti-Patterns with Kelsey Hightower

Kelsey Hightower joined Bryan and Adam to revisit a topic Bryan had spoken about a decade ago: corporate open source anti-patterns. Kelsey brought his typical sagacity to a complex and fraught topic.We've been hosting a live show weekly on Mondays at 5p for about an hour, and recording them all; here is the recording from August 28th, 2023.In addition to Bryan Cantrill and Adam Leventhal, we were joined by Kelsey Hightower.Here is the (lightly edited) live chat from the show:xxxxbubbler: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pm8P4oCIY3g here is Bryan's talk from 1 decade ago, for referencerolipo.li: web3 is going greatrolipo.li: https://web3isgoinggreat.com/ahl0003: Last time Kelsey joined us for predictionsblainehansen: "Governance orgies" happen when the governance mechanisms aren't well-designed ha. If they are well-designed then governance is good!jbk: opsware maybe? or tivoli?uptill3: hp openview was one as wellsevanj: "they've got us working for trinkets"sevanj: this was mentioned on the bugzilla anouncement regarding funded staff being pulled from working on project in the last 3 years.blainehansen: All open source problems are secretly public goods problems hahacarpetbomberz.com: Hashicorp DID do a "thing"blacksmithforlife: Just like taxes fund roads, we should have a internet usage tax that then funds these open source projects that everyone finds value in. The person taxed should get to decide which open source project gets the moneykaliszad: The problem is, you can help other people, but first you have to sustain yourself. 🙂aarondgoldman: Too boring to be evilrolipo.li: too busy to be evil?aarondgoldman: Angular never got budget even when Inbox used it and had millions of usersblainehansen: Most open source projects are probably not best led/governed by a for-profit company haaarondgoldman: HP had a huge repair service business when their hardware got much more reliable it almost killed the companygeekgonecrazy: Never actually considered using CNCF membership as a qualification for using a toolahl0003: it's the nintendo seal of quality!geekgonecrazy: It’s an interesting thought now that I’ve heard it 🙈 especially for any sort of core utility like thissaone: On the topic of patterns that seem to be working, Docker Desktop's license requiring subscriptions for larger organizations for use of their product and focusing on providing a really good developer experience seems to be a really good spot for them to begoodjanet: The term freeloading comes up only when there's a "problem" (usually fiscal in a company/group), the rest of the time the exact same actions are fine or often encouragedmrdanack: I disagree, there are freeloaders. Multi-billion companies like IBM and Oracle have benefited from the PHP project for multiple decades and really haven't contributed even a modest amount back.geekgonecrazy: Anytime hitting CLA I always use that as clue to take hesitation and think about contributing. 🙈quasarken: I love that bit about community Adamblacksmithforlife: https://www.linux.com/news/us-government-opens-access-federal-source-code-codegov/blainehansen: Sometimes a community of passionate contributors is more a burden than a gift. Every project is different, not every project can be supported by many well-paid engineers at vc-funded incentive-aligned companies. I don't think the BUSL is smart or good, but there's a funding/support problem here that legitimately needs to be solved, and the existing open source social contract hasn't solved it. https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2022/burden-open-source-maintainerblacksmithforlife: Disclaimer: I'm a federal employee who tried to get more software open source while I was working at various agencies. For the most part it was soundly ignored and the agencies just claimed it was too hard and they didn't have enough funding to do it, which in my opinion is just falseblacksmithforlife: But, if you want it, just do a FOIA, then they have to give it to yousaone: There's a great deal of fear at my company that software being open sourced must be carefully vetted to avoid potential embarassment so the hurdles to open source anything are very highgirgias: The French government has released code which was pure garbage, and I don't think one can do worse than the APB codegeekgonecrazy: That sucks. 😬I can totally see individual developers being afraid. I’ve faced that with my team. Weird to think org would be especially if trusting engineersnorthrup: Adam to your point though - I don't see how that's any different than other open source projects that aren't corporate backed. No open source projected is obligated to honor your issue to drive a project in a direction, or accept your PR to add a feature or function...ahl0003: Great point!blainehansen: The open source cooperative idea is the best I can come up with to solve the problemblacksmithforlife: What is dev rail?bcantrill: Developer relationsahl0003: developer relationsjbk: dev rel(ations)?bcantrill: JYNXblacksmithforlife: Never heard that term beforegeekgonecrazy: Curious at what scale you think devrel is needed vs the engineers in company directly involvedgeekgonecrazy: I’ve often wondered if doesn’t create unnecessary barrier between engineers and community. Especially at certain sizequasarken: Dev Rel seems a lot like community solutions engineeringgeekgonecrazy: I’ve personally seen some companies use devrel as sole tie to open source and “community” in place of more of company getting involvedrolipo.li: devrel as a service. now it's a consulting firm?northrup: When I worked at GitLab in the early days, some of my most favorite experiences were going to conferences and hanging out in the GitLab booth to answer questions and talk with / help users. SOO much great feedback, clear "oh wow!" edge cases brought forward, and amazing feedback of "yeah, you made this feature, but that wasn't what we needed"ahl0003: I remember liking this book on devrel: